AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 NGUYEN Martin 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 53%
2 NICOLETTI Luca 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 54%
3 RASMUSSEN Sage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 68%
3 LIN Youlong 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 53%
5 DERRICK Blake 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
6 PARK Rion 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
7 ZHANG Jacob 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 44% 8%
8 LING Eddie 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
9 WU Alber Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 64%
10 LO Preston 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 67%
10 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 32%
12 YI William 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 21%
13 CHEN Matthew 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 33% 4%
14 RAJ Jay 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 47%
15 ROZALSKI Eli 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 20%
15 LOZANO Veyron Jericho 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 56% 16%
17 BAE Eugene 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 34%
18 RAUTUREAU Hugo 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 11%
19 MORROW Brenden 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 19%
20 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 30% 6%
21 CORTRIGHT Skipper 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 23%
22 FUKUDA Diego 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
23 LI Richard 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 35% 7%
24 YU ZiRun (Kinton) 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 43% 7%
25 WANDJI Noah 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 28% 3%
25 ZHAN Kevin 100% 100% 94% 70% 34% 8% -
27 LE Jacob H. 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9%
28 ZHONG Maxwell 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 21% 2%
29 PARK David 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 17% 1%
30 KIM Daniel Y. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 13%
31 LU Kevin 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 34%
32 ZHOU Ryan 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 30% 6%
33 CHANG Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29% 5%
34 ELKOUSY Zain al Din 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 57% 10%
35 SISINNI Leonardo 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 17%
36 CHOI Benjamin 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 21%
37 CHANG Eric Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 60% 11%
38 LING Carson Jr 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 2%
39 RAUTUREAU Arthur 100% 100% 99% 91% 69% 34% 8%
40 LI Edison M. 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 18% 2%
41 UPENDER West 100% 100% 96% 80% 43% 12% 1%
42 RODRIGUEZ Tyler 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 31% 5%
43 HE Bourne 100% 98% 80% 35% 7% 1% -
44 PAN Ethan 100% 96% 75% 36% 8% 1% -
45 TSOI Spencer 100% 100% 95% 75% 39% 10% 1%
46 WONG Evan 100% 100% 99% 93% 74% 40% 10%
47 ONG Nicholas 100% 99% 93% 67% 27% 4% -
48 GORDON William L. 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
49 TSAY Jordan R. 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 16% 1%
50 BORG Matthew 100% 100% 94% 75% 40% 12% 2%
51 CHAN Joseph 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 8% -
52 PARKER Isaiah 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 10%
53 ZHANG Andrew 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% - -
54 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 36% 7%
55 MANIKTALA Suvir 100% 100% 94% 68% 28% 6% -
56 DENG David 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 20% 2%
57 WEI Winston 100% 91% 57% 15% 1% - -
58 CHEN Jason 100% 99% 89% 57% 21% 3% -
59 NISHIHIRA Tyler 100% 92% 64% 30% 8% 1% -
60 PETROV Mikhail 100% 88% 52% 18% 3% - -
61 PARK William 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 10% 1%
62 LIANG Ethan 100% 89% 53% 18% 3% - -
63 YANG Charles 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
64 PARK Andrew 100% 99% 92% 63% 23% 3% -
65 TOYOFUKU Ethan 100% 98% 82% 46% 14% 2% -
66 MCKEE Calvin 100% 99% 84% 47% 14% 2% -
67 BIELER Mason 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 65% 16%
68 FANG Haoyu 100% 99% 88% 60% 25% 5% -
69 DESERANNO Leander 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 40% 6%
70 FUKUDA Brando 100% 100% 100% 96% 73% 24% 2%
71 GANAPATHI Eshan 100% 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1%
72 DANIEL Nikith 100% 99% 91% 66% 28% 5% -
73 LIU Josh 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 13% 1%
74 LI Lucas 100% 100% 97% 81% 46% 13% 1%
75 YOU Alan 100% 99% 88% 60% 26% 6% 1%
76 TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin 100% 94% 71% 36% 10% 1% -
77 MA Oliver 100% 77% 32% 6% - - -
78 ANDRADE Cedric 100% 98% 83% 43% 10% 1% -
79 WU Thomas 100% 100% 97% 77% 39% 10% 1%
80 HONG Edwin 100% 99% 83% 42% 8% 1% -
81 CHANG Jeremy 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 27% 3%
82 YUE Jackson 100% 99% 90% 61% 26% 6% -
83 YU ShiLin (Harry) 100% 100% 93% 65% 24% 4% -
84 YE Jerry 100% 100% 95% 72% 34% 7% 1%
85 YU Eric 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 16% 2%
86 GUO Joey 100% 98% 81% 41% 11% 1% -
87 HE Ian 100% 97% 77% 38% 9% 1% -
87 ZHANG Yankai 100% 93% 66% 30% 7% 1% -
89 JACOB Ezra 100% 95% 67% 24% 3% - -
90 LEE Christopher 100% 91% 49% 12% 1% - -
91 WANG sicheng 100% 97% 77% 41% 12% 2% -
92 HUANG Nathan 100% 98% 82% 42% 10% 1% -
93 ARCARA Evan 100% 70% 27% 5% - - -
94 RAU Shogun 100% 98% 82% 35% 7% 1% -
95 YANG Steve 100% 99% 93% 67% 29% 6% -
96 SHEN Alaric 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
97 YU ShiYu (Henry) 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 12% 1%
98 KIM Andrew 100% 95% 62% 22% 4% - -
99 DULAI Agam 100% 92% 61% 23% 4% - -
100 LUK Trusten 100% 71% 29% 7% 1% - -
101 WONG Braxton 100% 83% 42% 11% 1% - -
102 MAO Runxian 100% 97% 74% 34% 8% 1% -
103 WANG Elijah (QiChen) 100% 98% 77% 36% 9% 1% -
104 ZHANG Jayden 100% 98% 81% 40% 7% - -
105 CHIANG Aiden 100% 63% 19% 2% - - -
105 YANG Tate 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 9% 1%
107 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 100% 88% 51% 15% 2% - -
108 LI Daniel 100% 88% 56% 21% 4% - -
109 CHOI Andrew 100% 98% 85% 55% 22% 4% -
110 AHN Theodore 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% - -
111 CHEN Aiden 100% 46% 9% 1% - - -
112 FOY Grant 100% 89% 57% 23% 6% 1% -
113 BOYNTON Alex 100% 54% 13% 1% - - -
114 SHU Eric 100% 54% 12% 1% - - -
115 DULAI Angad 100% 68% 26% 6% 1% - -
116 VALLADAO Balian 100% 99% 85% 46% 11% 1% -
117 FUNG Jace Y. 100% 69% 23% 4% - - -
118 SUN Neo 100% 77% 27% 4% - - -
119 PE Noah 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
120 OZCAN Archer 100% 31% 4% - - - -
121 HE Gary 100% 88% 42% 9% 1% - -
121 BHANOT Arjun 100% 92% 63% 26% 6% - -
123 BANUELOS Dario 100% 35% 5% - - - -
124 FEDOR Lucian 100% 44% 8% 1% - - -
125 CHAUDHARY Raza 100% 97% 79% 39% 10% 1% -
126 CHEUNG Henry 100% 64% 18% 2% - - -
127 VALENCIA Anthony N. 100% 70% 26% 5% - - -
127 VALLADAO Derek 100% 62% 18% 3% - - -
129 LI Austin 100% 99% 86% 47% 13% 1% -
130 ZHU Randy 100% 72% 24% 3% - - -
131 KONG Enoch 100% 96% 79% 46% 16% 3% -
132 TOYOFUKU Lucas 100% 57% 16% 2% - - -
132 CRIDLAND Trent 100% 96% 78% 44% 15% 3% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.