Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
2 | KIM Ethan | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% |
3 | WAXLER Ryan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
3 | FADEL Alexander | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
5 | ZHAO Royce | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
6 | YOOK Isaac | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
7 | LIU Ryan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 3% |
8 | ONG Dylan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
9 | PORTER Dupree | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
10 | SADHU Neiyam | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
11 | DEELY Hartigan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% | |
12 | TRZEPLA Max | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 2% |
14 | CHA James | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
15 | BALE ATMAN | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
16 | EPLETT Nicholas | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
17 | CLARK Aram | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
18 | KIARA Kinoti | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
19 | MIAO Heqi | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 44% | 15% | 1% |
20 | GORDON Samuel | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
21 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
22 | SONG Aidan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
23 | LEVIN Jacob | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
24 | DAI Zihou | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
25 | CHENG Sawyer | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
26 | SO Morgan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
27 | SARWAHI Viraat | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
28 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
29 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | ZHANG Ray | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
31 | CRAWFORD William | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
32 | WANG tiger | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
33 | MENZIES Liam | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | KENNEDY Tomás | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 3% |
35 | TAYCHER Aaron | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
35 | ARVIND Adhijay | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | SWIFT Owen | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
38 | CAREY Sam | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
39 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 31% | 34% | 15% |
40 | OREN Daniel | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
41 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | TUNIK Joshuah | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
43 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
44 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
45 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | AVERY Marcus | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | - |
47 | HOWARTH Hayes | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | NIEJADLIK Samuel | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
48 | SMITH William | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
50 | FIROOZI Sam | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
51 | GOMEZ Emilio | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | COGLIANO Max | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
53 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
54 | LAU Kyrus | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
55 | WEI William | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
56 | JIA Charles | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
57 | FORSTED Ian | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
58 | CHANG Timothy | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
58 | MAKAROV Alexander | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
60 | EARLEY Jack | 65% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
61 | SHARMA Colin | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
62 | GUPTA Arav | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
63 | CUSSON William | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
64 | VISH Manyu | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
65 | TITOV Zachary | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
66 | SAUVE Quinn | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
67 | CHAN Ewan | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
69 | WARREN Benjamin | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
70 | LEE Damian | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
71 | SARBU ERIC | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
72 | HAQUE Zain | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.