Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% |
| 2 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 3 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 3 | FADEL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 6 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 7 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | 3% |
| 8 | ONG Dylan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 10 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 11 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 12 | TRZEPLA Max | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 13 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 2% |
| 14 | CHA James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 16 | EPLETT Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 18 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 19 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% | 1% |
| 20 | GORDON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% | |
| 22 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 23 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 25 | CHENG Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | SO Morgan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 27 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 28 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 29 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WANG tiger | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
| 35 | TAYCHER Aaron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 35 | ARVIND Adhijay | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | SWIFT Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 38 | CAREY Sam | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 15% |
| 40 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 41 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | TUNIK Joshuah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 43 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% | |
| 44 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 45 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 47 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | NIEJADLIK Samuel | 100% | 91% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SMITH William | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | GOMEZ Emilio | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | COGLIANO Max | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 55 | WEI William | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 56 | JIA Charles | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | FORSTED Ian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 58 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | MAKAROV Alexander | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 60 | EARLEY Jack | 100% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | SHARMA Colin | 100% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | GUPTA Arav | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | CUSSON William | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 65 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
| 66 | SAUVE Quinn | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | MARSHQUIST Miles | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | WARREN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 70 | LEE Damian | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | SARBU ERIC | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 72 | HAQUE Zain | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.