Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
2 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
3 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
3 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
5 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
6 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
7 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 11% | |
8 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
9 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 17% | |
10 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | 2% |
11 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
12 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
13 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
14 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
15 | ZHANG Gavin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
16 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
17 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
18 | WANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
19 | OH Joshua | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | - |
20 | HU Daniel | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | SIU Max | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
22 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
23 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
24 | YAVENDITTI William | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
25 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
26 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% | |
27 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
28 | VENAFRO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 7% | |
29 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
30 | ARORA Maximilian Andras A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | BRAIZINHA David | 100% | 95% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | |
32 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
33 | ROTH Gavin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
34 | KIAYIAS Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
35 | BAS Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
36 | LI Jayden | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
37 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
38 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
39 | FREL Vincent | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
40 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% | - |
41 | HU Michael | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
42 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 6% | - | |
43 | PAN Jason | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% | - |
44 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | LIU Brady | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
47 | MANCHALA Vedanth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
48 | WU Alexander | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
49 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
50 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 92% | 57% | 20% | 4% | - | |
51 | MOON Nicolas | 100% | 79% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
52 | DAVIDSON Henry | 100% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
53 | TIAN Dylan | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
54 | ZHONG Albert | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | YUNG Zak | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
56 | WANG Joshua | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
57 | LIU Gene | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
58 | ROTH Adam | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
59 | ZHAO David | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
60 | LU Baisu | 100% | 86% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
61 | ALIMI Mousa | 100% | 44% | 6% | - | - | - | |
62 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | HUANG Marcus | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | ROSENTHAL Hugh | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.