Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 2 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% | |
| 3 | WANG justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 3 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 5 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | |
| 6 | SETO Jing | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 7 | XI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
| 8 | SHOUSHA Yassin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 9 | PALLADINO Ben T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
| 10 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 11 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | |
| 12 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
| 13 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 14 | OKUN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% | |
| 16 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 26% | 3% |
| 17 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 18 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 99% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | JIANG ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 20 | CAO Ray | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Dinghao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 7% |
| 24 | ALABI Tobi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
| 25 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Wyatt | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 28 | SHONEMAN Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 4% |
| 29 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 30 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 31 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 32 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 34 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 40 | SPRINGER Elijah | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 69% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 44 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 97% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | GAO Victor | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - | |
| 46 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 48 | YU Samuel | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 49 | SCHAUER Oliver | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHOU Benson | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | LI Jaden | 100% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | URBAN Leo | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 57 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.