Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GHEDINI Luca | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | MARTIN Darius | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | CHEN Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | CHEN Hanson | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 5 | SIMONOV Timofey | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 6 | LI Bradley | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 7 | CHO Xzander | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | XU Nathan | V V D V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | SION Andrew | V D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | GERRISH William | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | ZHAO Ryan | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 12 | TOOMRE Kai | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | HOU Gaven | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | YAVENDITTI William | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 15 | HARRA Alexander | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 16 | GRIGORIEV Michael | D V V D D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | CHENG Logan | V V V V V D | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 18 | MARTIRE Luca | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 18 | SENANI Arjun | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | KRZYWON Dylan | V D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 21 | NOVIKOV Yann | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | WONG Jacob W. | D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 23 | JIN Andy | D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | HAN Alexander | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | CHEN kenneth | D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | MO Ethan | V D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | HELMY Richard | D V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 28 | SHANNON Jack | D D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 29 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | CZARNECKI Thomas | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | BRAIZINHA David | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 32 | BO Aiden | V D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 33 | WU Isaac | V D V V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 34 | WANG Luke | V D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 35 | FOGELSON Hugh | V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | REN Ryan | V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 37 | ONIK Ari N. | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 38 | ZHANG Ethan | D D V D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | REYES Yannik | V D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 40 | ZHENG Austin | V D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 41 | WANG Ancen | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 42 | ZHANG Gavin | D V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 43 | HART-SYED declan | D D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 44 | FROST Chayse | V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 45 | LI Jayden | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 46 | CHUN Alexander | D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 47 | XIA Philip | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 48 | QIAN Zekai | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 49 | ZHENG Christopher | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 50 | HU Daniel | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 51 | CHUN Zachary | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 52 | CHANG Ian | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 53 | YOUM Tyson | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 54 | KINGSLEY Griffin | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 55 | KIAYIAS Alexander | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 56 | TIAN Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 57 | HERBST Ari | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 57 | LIANG Haojia | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.