Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% | |
| 2 | MARTIN Darius | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 3 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 5 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 6 | LI Bradley | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 61% | |
| 7 | CHO Xzander | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 8 | XU Nathan | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 9 | SION Andrew | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | GERRISH William | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% |
| 11 | ZHAO Ryan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 12 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
| 13 | HOU Gaven | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 20% | |
| 14 | YAVENDITTI William | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 15 | HARRA Alexander | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 45% | 8% | |
| 17 | CHENG Logan | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 18 | MARTIRE Luca | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | SENANI Arjun | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 20 | KRZYWON Dylan | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | NOVIKOV Yann | - | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 22 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 23 | JIN Andy | 1% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | HAN Alexander | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
| 25 | CHEN kenneth | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | MO Ethan | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | HELMY Richard | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
| 28 | SHANNON Jack | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 3% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 1% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | BRAIZINHA David | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | BO Aiden | 48% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WU Isaac | 3% | 36% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | WANG Luke | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | FOGELSON Hugh | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 26% | 3% | |
| 36 | REN Ryan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 37 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
| 38 | ZHANG Ethan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | REYES Yannik | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ZHENG Austin | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Ancen | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Gavin | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% |
| 43 | HART-SYED declan | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | FROST Chayse | - | 4% | 26% | 49% | 19% | 2% | |
| 45 | LI Jayden | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | CHUN Alexander | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | XIA Philip | 6% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 49 | ZHENG Christopher | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | HU Daniel | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | CHUN Zachary | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | CHANG Ian | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | YOUM Tyson | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 55 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 2% | 32% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | TIAN Dylan | 32% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HERBST Ari | 29% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | LIANG Haojia | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.