Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 2 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% |
| 3 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 3 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 5 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
| 6 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 7 | HAN Keyi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
| 8 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
| 9 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 10 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
| 11 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 3% | |
| 12 | BEYER Timothy | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | ZHANG Shuhao | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 14 | GIORDANO Zach | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 15 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | TOPRANI Valmik | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 18 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 20 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 21 | SHEYDIN Barry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
| 22 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 24 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 25 | YU David | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | TANG Milo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | MCGANN Grant | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | SHI Evan | 100% | 90% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MCGINLEY Felix | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 37 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | |
| 38 | JIN Derek | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | PARKER Wilson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
| 40 | YU George | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 41 | GENG Michael | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | MUELLER Travis | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | SANTANA Sebastian | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | LANDMAN Martin | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.