SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 2 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 3 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% |
| 3 | WANG yining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 5 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 6 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% |
| 7 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 8 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 9 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 10 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 11 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 12 | KWON Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 13 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 14 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 15 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 17% | |
| 16 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 17 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 19 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 21 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LEE Alyson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 23 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | |
| 24 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
| 25 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 26 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 8% |
| 28 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 29 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 30 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 32 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 34 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 97% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 36 | ILAGAN Ava | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% | |
| 38 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | < 1% | - | |
| 39 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | BAIK Sarah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | LIU Moran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 42 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 44 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 46 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 100% | 94% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 49 | PRESANTH Nandana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | MCGRAW Sadie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 52 | YU Helen | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 53 | HANLON Lucy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 54 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | AWAD Royce | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 58 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 59 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | VATS Ishita | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | TIAN Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 62 | REKHTMAN Alice | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | NICHOLAS Eva | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 64 | HO Sophia | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 65 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 66 | GUHA Surabhi | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% | |
| 68 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 69 | CONNOLLY Vida | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 70 | SUH Gah Ohn Anna | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | BABBITT Kayla | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 72 | REN Katherine | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 73 | SHEN Emily | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 74 | BIBLER Anna | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | RIFKIN Lielle | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 76 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 77 | JUILLERAT Elina | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 78 | KALISHMAN Anna | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 78 | CHANDRA adithi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 80 | YAN Lena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 81 | MCGOWAN Grace | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 84 | YAO Annabelle | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | KULIK Sophia | 100% | 65% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 87 | XU Elaine | 100% | 86% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | COLE Beatrice | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 89 | STEINBERG Lynn | 100% | 96% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | TSANG Therese | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 91 | GETZONI Mary | 100% | 59% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | MANGAT Alexis | 100% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.