Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LEVY Jasper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
2 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
3 | LIU Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% |
3 | MCGILLION-MOORE Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
5 | PRILUTSKY David B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
6 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
7 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
8 | HU Oliver W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
9 | ZHOU TIMMY | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
10 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
11 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
12 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
13 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
14 | ADLER David R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
15 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
16 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
17 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
18 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
19 | GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
20 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
21 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
22 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
23 | STANLEY Mason B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
24 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
25 | MA Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
26 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
27 | PETER Griffin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
28 | SLEDESKI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
29 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
30 | RECHLER Logan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | |
31 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
32 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | JANG Jaewon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
34 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 4% |
35 | REGE Advaith | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 3% | |
36 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
37 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
38 | WU Albert | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
39 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
40 | BATRAK Alexander | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
41 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
43 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
44 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
45 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
46 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | |
47 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
48 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
49 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 99% | 70% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
50 | SCHULTES Evans | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
51 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | - |
52 | MARSHALL Ian | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
53 | DENYSE Jameson | 100% | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - |
54 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
55 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
56 | WEINKOPF William O. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
57 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
58 | HU Robin | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
59 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
60 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 100% | 99% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
62 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
63 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
64 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
65 | O'DEA Gabriel | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
66 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
67 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
68 | GU Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
69 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
70 | FU Yifan | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
71 | JUSTUS Benjamin | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
72 | RADTKE Jakob | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.