Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Jayden J. | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 39% | 6% | |
| 2 | LIU Josh | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 3 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 3 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 5 | HUANG Kenneth | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 6 | KIM Henry | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 7 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 40% | 9% | |
| 8 | KIM Teddy | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 9% | |
| 9 | CHEN Jayden | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 10 | LI zerong | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | WU Johnny y. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 12 | YI Nathan | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | LIU Zicheng | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | GOROZA Eric | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
| 15 | VESELOV Artemis | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
| 16 | YILMAZ Tarik | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 17 | EMERSON Zachary | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 18 | MUDGE Lachlan | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 19 | ROBERTS Arthur | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | MILANOV Vihren | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 21 | XUE Michael | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | CAFASSO Alexander | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | YUE Bryan | 6% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 15% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | CAMPOS Sebastian | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | WANG Marcus | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | MA Nolan | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 28 | TUMULA Arihaan | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | CHEN Aiden | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 30 | WANG Jiacheng | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | MA Ciel | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | SUN Evan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | WU Nathan | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | SUN Neo | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | WALKER Mclain | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | VICK Ethan | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | INGHILTERRA Luca | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | GOODHEART Mateo | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.