Brentwood High School - Brentwood, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% |
| 2 | WARD Edward | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
| 3 | NAZARIAN Jonah | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 5 | CROSSMAN Brandon | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 47% | 19% |
| 5 | SCHROEDER Dylan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 7 | JU Hanul | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 8 | SHIN Ryan | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 48% | 10% |
| 9 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 10 | PAINTER Noah | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | CHARETTE Alex | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | XU Wangzitai | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 14 | BELLASARIAN Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | CLARKE Luca | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 6% |
| 16 | KIM Tristan | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 17 | GAUTHIER-PARKER Harrison | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 18 | BANGAYAN Anthony | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 3% |
| 19 | STAFFORD Michael | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 20 | DAO Thomas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 21 | SUH Victor | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 22 | BISSADA Matthew | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 23 | BAILIN Tyler | 8% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | O'GARA Theodore | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 25 | SCHERZAY Ian | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | IYER Pranav | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 26 | CHARETTE Matthew | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | REECE Chapin | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 29 | BOTYANSZKI Balint | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
| 30 | WELLS William | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | PROCTER Griffin | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | WILSON Theodore | 4% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 33 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 34 | STAFFORD Bryan | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 2% |
| 35 | CHEN David | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 36 | THORNTON Maximilian | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | YANAI Charlie | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | GAINSLEY Isaac | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 39 | JONES Rodney | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 40 | PALMARES Xavier | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | BECK Eli | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 42 | CORZO-SANDINO Lorenzo | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 43 | ORMOND Andrew | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | DAI Markenever | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 45 | FRIEDMAN Jonas | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 46 | ZAPATA Matthew | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | PAEK Marcus | 11% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 48 | ERNST Frederick | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 49 | GARCIA Miguel | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 50 | LARI Matthew | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 50 | SEMIDEY Tomaso | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 50 | SANDOVAL-CUDE Maxwell | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | BYRNE Quinlan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 53 | GUILLERMO Dante | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
| 55 | SAUTER Luke | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | KAMRAS Ryan | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | DAI MIKENEVER | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 58 | RAILLARD Ocean | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | PALAPA Yair | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
| 60 | WELD Theo | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 61 | BAKER Livingston Xander | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 62 | YOUNG Trevor | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | DILORENZO Peter | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 63 | HERRERA Kevin | 3% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 65 | DONOHUE Angus | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 66 | CALDWELL Sean | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.