Brentwood High School - Brentwood, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 33% |
2 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 20% |
3 | NAZARIAN Jonah | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
3 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
5 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 19% |
5 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
7 | JU Hanul | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
8 | SHIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 10% |
9 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
10 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
11 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
12 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
13 | XU Wangzitai | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
14 | BELLASARIAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | 2% |
15 | CLARKE Luca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% |
16 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
17 | GAUTHIER-PARKER Harrison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
18 | BANGAYAN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 3% |
19 | STAFFORD Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
20 | DAO Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
21 | SUH Victor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
22 | BISSADA Matthew | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
23 | BAILIN Tyler | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
24 | O'GARA Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
25 | SCHERZAY Ian | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
26 | IYER Pranav | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
26 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | REECE Chapin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
29 | BOTYANSZKI Balint | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
30 | WELLS William | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
31 | PROCTER Griffin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
32 | WILSON Theodore | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - |
33 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
34 | STAFFORD Bryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% |
35 | CHEN David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
36 | THORNTON Maximilian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
37 | YANAI Charlie | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
38 | GAINSLEY Isaac | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
39 | JONES Rodney | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
40 | PALMARES Xavier | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | BECK Eli | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
42 | CORZO-SANDINO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
43 | ORMOND Andrew | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
44 | DAI Markenever | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
45 | FRIEDMAN Jonas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
46 | ZAPATA Matthew | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
47 | PAEK Marcus | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
48 | ERNST Frederick | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
49 | GARCIA Miguel | 100% | 98% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
50 | LARI Matthew | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
50 | SEMIDEY Tomaso | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
50 | SANDOVAL-CUDE Maxwell | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
53 | BYRNE Quinlan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
53 | GUILLERMO Dante | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 8% |
55 | SAUTER Luke | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | KAMRAS Ryan | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
57 | DAI MIKENEVER | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
58 | RAILLARD Ocean | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | PALAPA Yair | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
60 | WELD Theo | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
61 | BAKER Livingston Xander | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
62 | YOUNG Trevor | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
63 | DILORENZO Peter | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
63 | HERRERA Kevin | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | - |
65 | DONOHUE Angus | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | - |
66 | CALDWELL Sean | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.