Bellevue, WA - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 62% |
2 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
3 | WONG Adam L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
3 | ZHANG Nicholas Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
5 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
6 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
7 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
8 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
9 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
10 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% | - |
11 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
12 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
13 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
14 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
15 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
16 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
17 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 4% | |
18 | NAYGAS Lawrence I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 6% | |
19 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - | |
20 | GREENBAUM Andrew | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
21 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 12% | - |
22 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
23 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 2% |
24 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
25 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
26 | HE Yuhao | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
27 | ROSSMAN Brock | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | - |
28 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
29 | CHUNG Yeongbin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 4% |
30 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 6% | |
31 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 93% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
32 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
33 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
34 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
35 | PAMPENA Rocco S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
36 | MAKO Kieran | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
37 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
38 | MA Bryant | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
39 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
40 | BEAVER Aaron | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
41 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | - |
42 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
43 | KHER Roan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
44 | YU Wenqiao | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
45 | STAVREFF Michael | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
47 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
48 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
51 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
52 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
54 | TAPUS Alexandru | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
54 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
56 | TAN Christien | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
57 | WATT Xander | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
58 | LI Jett | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
59 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
60 | OH Joshua | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
61 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
62 | LINDER James | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
63 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
64 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
66 | BUTLER Simon | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.