Student Recreation Center @ Texas State University - San Marcos, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KRAMER Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | |
| 2 | POPOVICI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | |
| 3 | LUEBBE Jost | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 3 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 5 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 97% | 69% | 21% | ||
| 6 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 7 | WOODALL Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 8 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 9 | SALEH Omar | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 10 | SCEROLER Anslee | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 11 | EMMERT Jp | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 20% | |
| 12 | GOODMAN Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 13 | SAIKOLAPPAN Narensankar | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | KASKAN Peter E. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 9% | |
| 15 | RAO Neil | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 16 | TAYLOR Liam F. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 17 | NGUYEN Bao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 2% | |
| 18 | MANGAN Hunter | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 19 | SMITH Samuel J. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 3% | |
| 20 | PATEL Avi | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 3% | |
| 21 | BIGGS Jacob | 100% | 91% | 45% | 6% | ||
| 22 | BARTON Christian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 23 | FRANZESE Nicholas P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 43% | ||
| 24 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 2% | |
| 25 | HAWLEY Justin | 100% | 80% | 32% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | COLARES BADKE TOCCHETTO Lucca | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 2% | |
| 27 | WILLIAMS Nasir | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 3% |
| 28 | NG Dylan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | - | |
| 31 | GRIMSHAW Tim | 100% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | REHUREK Luke | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | HURT Stone | 100% | 75% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | LE Nathan | 100% | 87% | 45% | 8% | - | |
| 36 | JAMAIL Luke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 37 | THOMA Jackson | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | HWANG Joseph | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | NEWSOM Finn | 100% | 66% | 18% | - | - | |
| 40 | TIEMANN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
| 41 | TULLY Gage | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | ||
| 42 | JAMES thomas | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 43 | TAPSCOTT Nicolas | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.