William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | PANE Patrick | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 2 | ANDERSON Derek M. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 3 | WALLACE George | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
| 3 | WATSON Raymond | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 32% | |
| 5 | PHILLIPS Ethan D. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 6 | FEAGIN Patrick | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 7 | MORTIMER Gavin | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% |
| 8 | SUN Ethan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | CHEMEZOV Trent | - | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 10 | SINGH Jawand | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 11 | MILLER Luke | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 12 | BARTLETT Lauren | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 13 | MONTESI Eric | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 14 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 15 | LEE Benjamin | 19% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | - | < 1% | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 17 | BADLANI Neel | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 18 | DOYLE Jacob | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
| 19 | KARASICK Andrew | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | ANDERSON Dean | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 21 | SONVICO Jeremy | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 22 | TANG Justin | 5% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 23 | LUNDEN Espen | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | MOORE Mary | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | KRONAUGE Andersen | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | WANG Kobe | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | BJERKNESS Riley | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 28 | ROUADY Ryan | 2% | 17% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | MCDOWELL Finn | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.