Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHAW Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 32% | |
| 2 | RUTHERFURD John "Trace" | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 41% | |
| 3 | FORD Tillman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 4 | WAGNER Lyndsay | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 19% | |
| 5 | WEBB Jacob | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 9% | ||
| 6 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 7 | ZHOU Alec | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 8 | SINGH Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
| 9 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 29% | 4% | |
| 10 | KULIKOWSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 32% | |
| 11 | PARCELEWICZ John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | 4% | |
| 12 | YAWN Joshua | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | WANG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 14 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 12% | |
| 15 | NWOKOLO Lotenne | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 16 | LEE Daehyeon | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | CARRIE Konnor | 100% | 87% | 42% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 19 | SOTTILE Cole | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | MAI Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 21 | ORLANDO Dante | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
| 22 | CANTRELL Jason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | ||
| 23 | CHAMBERS Matthew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% | ||
| 24 | HAWKINS Sophia | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | TUCKER Evan | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | ||
| 26 | FRAZIER Wylie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 27 | PIERCE Chandon | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MOSS Riley | 100% | 95% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | AGUILLON Alexis | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | - | |
| 32 | RAVITA Henry | 100% | 56% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | WATKINS James | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 34 | MACKEVICIUS Nykolas | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | DOUGLAS John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 3% | |
| 36 | LY Gabriel | 100% | 96% | 70% | 25% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | AGYEN-FREMPONG Nic | 100% | 97% | 73% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | ELEY Ellis | 100% | 97% | 65% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | SHADOFF Samantha | 100% | 86% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | STEWART Sarah | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | MCLENDON Matthew | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | DORAN McKenna | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | RATTEERREE Michelle | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | MENDEZ Lucero | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.