Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CHENG Logan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | KO Caleb | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 3 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 3 | MARTIN Darius | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 50% | 9% |
| 5 | BORKOWSKI Olgierd | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 6 | MO Ethan | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 7 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 35% |
| 8 | SENANI Arjun | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | CHO Xzander | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 26% |
| 10 | MARTIRE Luca | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 11 | XU Nathan | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 12 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 13 | BAI Austin | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 14 | CHEN kenneth | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | KUO Phineas | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 17 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 17 | HOLMES Alexiy | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
| 19 | QIAN Zekai | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 30% | 2% |
| 20 | HOU Gaven | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 20% | 2% |
| 21 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 23 | DIAZ Gabriel | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | LIANG Haojia | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | HAN Alexander | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 26 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | WU Isaac | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | KRZYWON Dylan | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | ZHENG Austin | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | KOVACS Harrison | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | MOREA Anderson | 9% | 35% | 40% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BEYDOUN Sam | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | WANG Ancen | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 34 | ZHANG Ethan | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | - |
| 35 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 36 | ZHANG Julian | 16% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | HWANG Jacob | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | KAYE Ben | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 39 | REYES Yannik | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | FOGELSON Hugh | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 40 | YOUM Tyson | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | ULYSSE Jacob | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 43 | WANG Luke | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 44 | BLACK Henry | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHOI Hunter | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | ZHANG Ethan | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | BAS Jonathan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | BRAIZINHA David | 13% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.