William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DIMMETT David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
2 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | |
3 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
5 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
6 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
7 | MOLITERNI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
8 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 4% |
9 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% |
10 | BRATTON Jack S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
11 | WALLACE George | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
12 | SCHAPIRO Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 15% | |
13 | HURST Palmer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% | 4% | |
14 | ANDERSON Derek M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% | |
15 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
16 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | |
17 | GRESHAM Rebekah L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
18 | SUN Ethan | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
19 | ZALEWSKI David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
20 | WHITE Myles | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
21 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
21 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
23 | MILLER Luke | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
24 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 5% |
25 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
26 | LAM Bill | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
27 | GUMPRICH Joe P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
28 | MILLSON Daniel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
29 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 87% | 46% | 8% | - | - | |
30 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
31 | PANE Patrick | 100% | 98% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | |
32 | LUNDEN Espen | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | MONTESI Eric | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
34 | ANDERSON Dean | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
35 | FEAGIN Patrick | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | MOORE Mary | 100% | 92% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
37 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | SONVICO Jeremy | 100% | 90% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SINGH Jawand | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
40 | BADLANI Neel | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
41 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | EVANS George | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
43 | MCDOWELL Finn | 100% | 80% | 32% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | KARASICK Andrew | 100% | 88% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
45 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
46 | WALKER Joseph | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | BARBER Christopher | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
48 | GRESHAM Sarah L. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
49 | TANG Justin | 100% | 82% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | |
50 | KEIM Spencer | 100% | 94% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
51 | ROUADY Ryan | 100% | 68% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
52 | SALAM Siam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.