University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 45% | 7% |
| 2 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | WEBB Jacob T. | 100% | 95% | 67% | 22% | |
| 3 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 23% |
| 5 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 38% |
| 6 | WALLACE James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 13% |
| 7 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
| 8 | WILLIAMS Eli | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 11% |
| 9 | PAYNE John T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 67% |
| 9 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | SOPER Adam | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | POBIS Chandler R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 51% |
| 13 | REYNOLDS Jay | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
| 14 | KONG Chuizheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
| 15 | EDGECOMB Michael J. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 13% | |
| 16 | STUESSY Nolan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 17 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 100% | 99% | 63% | 17% | 1% |
| 18 | CALINSKY Edward | 100% | 100% | 96% | 60% | 9% |
| 19 | FORD Tillman | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 3% |
| 20 | LEVEQUE David G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 21 | SEATON Jake | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 22 | HAWKINS Sophia | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
| 23 | PARISH Levi | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CAMPBELL Joseph L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 24 | DEEL Hayes | 100% | 96% | 55% | 14% | 1% |
| 24 | STEWART Brian | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 12% |
| 27 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - |
| 28 | KINDEL Amara | 100% | 98% | 76% | 33% | 6% |
| 29 | SCHUYLER Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 4% |
| 30 | DERRINGER Derrick | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | HAUSER Samuel | 100% | 84% | 34% | 5% | |
| 32 | BEDWORTH Paige | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 34 | BULLER Chloe | 100% | 69% | 18% | - | - |
| 35 | BLAIR Hailey | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 36 | BARBER Christopher | 100% | 92% | 52% | 13% | 1% |
| 36 | RHOTON Christian | 100% | 85% | 43% | 8% | |
| 38 | NIST Carter | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 7% |
| 39 | WAHL Nathan | 100% | 93% | 41% | 6% | - |
| 39 | HALE Eli | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 41 | BRANHAM Willow | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% |
| 42 | SPAULDING Maleah | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WASH James | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 7% |
| 44 | CROSS Phoenix | 100% | 75% | 27% | 2% | - |
| 45 | ORDONEZ Drew | 100% | 79% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 46 | OVERSTREET William | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
| 47 | BASSO Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 4% |
| 48 | BACARISSE Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 5% |
| 49 | VALENZUELA Elijah | 100% | 92% | 56% | 15% | 1% |
| 50 | BARRETT John | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.