Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KVOLS-RIEDLER Tyler | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
2 | KARNES Jameson | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
3 | BECKER Dylan | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
3 | DOARES Andrew | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% |
5 | SAMY Evin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
6 | JUTRAS Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
8 | NORMAN Lillia | - | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - |
9 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
10 | NORTON Stephen | 1% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
11 | KLEIN Andrew | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | - |
12 | MOORE Jeremy | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
13 | LU Victor | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
14 | LAMONTAGNE Derek | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
15 | PINEDA Gabriel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
16 | SU Lai Jing | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
17 | BECKER Kaitlyn | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 44% | 16% |
18 | PATEL Jeet | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
19 | PAULINE Makenzie | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
20 | DUPREE Thomas | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | BUTLER Evan | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
22 | KREHL Ethan S. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
23 | LEAR Donald | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
24 | SEGARD Ian | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
25 | HERNER Savannah | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
25 | PHAM Christopher | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
27 | CREWS Christy | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
28 | PROUDNIK Anthony | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | NEWCOMER Rose | 2% | 20% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
30 | MILLER Matthew | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
31 | SMITH R.J. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | WHITE Ethan | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | MCINTOSH Uma | 33% | 46% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
34 | VO Khanh | 25% | 46% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.