Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KVOLS-RIEDLER Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% |
| 2 | KARNES Jameson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | |
| 3 | BECKER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 3 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 5 | SAMY Evin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 6 | JUTRAS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 7% |
| 8 | NORMAN Lillia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 9 | PAK Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 10 | NORTON Stephen | 100% | 99% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 11 | KLEIN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 12 | MOORE Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | LU Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 14 | LAMONTAGNE Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 15 | PINEDA Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 16 | SU Lai Jing | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | BECKER Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 16% |
| 18 | PATEL Jeet | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 19 | PAULINE Makenzie | 100% | 91% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | DUPREE Thomas | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | BUTLER Evan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 22 | KREHL Ethan S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | LEAR Donald | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 24 | SEGARD Ian | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | HERNER Savannah | 100% | 80% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | PHAM Christopher | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | CREWS Christy | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 28 | PROUDNIK Anthony | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | NEWCOMER Rose | 100% | 98% | 78% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | MILLER Matthew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | SMITH R.J. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WHITE Ethan | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MCINTOSH Uma | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | VO Khanh | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.