Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BECKER Dylan | - | 2% | 23% | 50% | 26% | |
| 2 | PINEDA Gabriel | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 17% |
| 3 | LEAR Donald | - | 5% | 33% | 45% | 15% | 1% |
| 3 | PATEL Jeet | - | 7% | 40% | 41% | 12% | |
| 5 | MILOCCO Dom | - | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 33% |
| 6 | SAMY Evin | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 7 | LAMONTAGNE Derek | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% |
| 8 | JUTRAS Daniel | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
| 9 | MOORE Jeremy | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
| 10 | NORTON Stephen | - | 2% | 21% | 47% | 30% | |
| 11 | LU Victor | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 12 | KLEIN Andrew | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% |
| 14 | BUTLER Evan | 4% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 15 | NORMAN Lillia | 1% | 21% | 49% | 25% | 4% | |
| 17 | SEGARD Ian | 2% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 18 | DUPREE Thomas | 4% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 3% | |
| 19 | PAULINE Makenzie | 3% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 20 | VO Khanh | 55% | 41% | 4% | - | - | |
| 21 | FORTNA Miscia | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 22 | PROUDNIK Anthony | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | KREHL Ethan S. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | MAUL Judy | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SMITH R.J. | 24% | 46% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | PHAM Christopher | 10% | 45% | 38% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | MILLER Matthew | 29% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | NEWCOMER Rose | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | WHITE Ethan | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.