Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BECKER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 26% | |
2 | PINEDA Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% |
3 | LEAR Donald | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | 16% | 1% |
3 | PATEL Jeet | 100% | 100% | 93% | 53% | 12% | |
5 | MILOCCO Dom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 33% |
6 | SAMY Evin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
7 | LAMONTAGNE Derek | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
8 | JUTRAS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% |
9 | MOORE Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
10 | NORTON Stephen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 30% | |
11 | LU Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
12 | KLEIN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 5% |
14 | BUTLER Evan | 100% | 96% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - |
15 | NORMAN Lillia | 100% | 99% | 78% | 29% | 4% | |
17 | SEGARD Ian | 100% | 98% | 78% | 34% | 4% | - |
18 | DUPREE Thomas | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 3% | |
19 | PAULINE Makenzie | 100% | 97% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - |
20 | VO Khanh | 100% | 45% | 4% | - | - | |
21 | FORTNA Miscia | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
22 | PROUDNIK Anthony | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | KREHL Ethan S. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | MAUL Judy | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
26 | SMITH R.J. | 100% | 76% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
27 | PHAM Christopher | 100% | 90% | 45% | 7% | - | |
28 | MILLER Matthew | 100% | 71% | 16% | 1% | - | |
29 | NEWCOMER Rose | 100% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
30 | WHITE Ethan | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.