Gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CEKAN Luis | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
2 | BARON Benoit | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
3 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
3 | HANDBERG Paul | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
5 | THAYER Bryce | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
6 | LLANOS Alex | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
7 | JAMES Edward (EJ) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
8 | SHIVPRASAD Akshaya | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
9 | MOORE Jeremy | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
10 | GARCIA Christopher | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
11 | STEELE Demario | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | ||
12 | FREY Wayne | - | 2% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 5% | |
13 | AKINS Winston | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
14 | ALVIOR Jacob | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
15 | BUCUR Rebekah | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
16 | KOUSTIKOV Max | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
17 | WAGMAN Robert | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% | ||
18 | PINCKNEY John | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
19 | CHENG Ava | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
20 | BURNS Richard | 2% | 20% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
21 | PEREZ Gabriella | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
22 | HEINZE Luke | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
23 | RAMCHARAN Zachary | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
24 | BRACELIS Josias | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | ||
25 | MCFARLAND John | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
26 | WIERCIOCH Tomasz | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
27 | VON ESCHEN Benjamin | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
28 | BARON Loic | 1% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% | - | |
29 | TAUBLER Michelle | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | ||
30 | MAVRODIEV Nickolay | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
31 | DAVIS John | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
32 | CLAYTON Robert | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
34 | WILLIAMS Ashley | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 9% | ||
35 | DENG Nathan | - | 3% | 29% | 44% | 21% | 3% | |
36 | PAULK Nikki | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
37 | ASH Neil | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | DUPREE Thomas | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
39 | FULLERTON Joshua | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
40 | THOMPSON Ben | 18% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | PORTER Stephany | 35% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | MARIN Lucas | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
43 | LORES Alicia | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
44 | CONCEPCION Max | 12% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
46 | POPA Raluca | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
50 | JANES Cole | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
51 | BACCHUS Leah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.