Gainesville, FL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CEKAN Luis | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 2 | BARON Benoit | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan | D V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | HANDBERG Paul | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 5 | THAYER Bryce | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | LLANOS Alex | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | JAMES Edward (EJ) | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | SHIVPRASAD Akshaya | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 9 | MOORE Jeremy | V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 10 | GARCIA Christopher | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 11 | STEELE Demario | D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 12 | FREY Wayne | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | AKINS Winston | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | ALVIOR Jacob | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 15 | BUCUR Rebekah | D V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | KOUSTIKOV Max | V D V V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | WAGMAN Robert | V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 18 | PINCKNEY John | V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | CHENG Ava | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | BURNS Richard | V D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | PEREZ Gabriella | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 22 | HEINZE Luke | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | RAMCHARAN Zachary | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | BRACELIS Josias | V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | MCFARLAND John | V D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 26 | WIERCIOCH Tomasz | D V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 27 | VON ESCHEN Benjamin | D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | BARON Loic | V D D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | TAUBLER Michelle | D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | MAVRODIEV Nickolay | D V V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 31 | DAVIS John | D V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | CLAYTON Robert | D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | WILLIAMS Ashley | D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 35 | DENG Nathan | V D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 36 | PAULK Nikki | V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 37 | ASH Neil | V D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | DUPREE Thomas | V D D V D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 39 | FULLERTON Joshua | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 40 | THOMPSON Ben | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 41 | PORTER Stephany | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 42 | MARIN Lucas | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 43 | LORES Alicia | D D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 44 | CONCEPCION Max | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 46 | POPA Raluca | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 50 | JANES Cole | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 51 | BACCHUS Leah | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.