Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HAYES Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
2 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
3 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
3 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
5 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
6 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% |
7 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
8 | FENG Grace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
9 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
10 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
11 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
12 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
13 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
14 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
15 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
16 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
17 | WANG SIQI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
18 | LIN Zhi Tong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
19 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
20 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
20 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
22 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 98% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
23 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
24 | YANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
25 | LUO Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
26 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% |
28 | MU Allison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 8% | |
29 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
30 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
31 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
32 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
33 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 4% |
34 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% |
35 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
36 | WANG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
37 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
38 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
39 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
40 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
41 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
42 | YU Jane | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
43 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
44 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
45 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
46 | KO Claire | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
47 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
48 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
49 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
50 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
51 | HU Felice | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
51 | HAO Danica | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
53 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
54 | PAULUS Sloane E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
55 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
56 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
57 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
58 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
59 | WANG CAROL | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
60 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
61 | LIU Long | 100% | 86% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
62 | CUI alivia | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
63 | WANG Sophia | 100% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | |
64 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
65 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
66 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
67 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
68 | DONG Angela | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
69 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
70 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
71 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
72 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
73 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | HARRIS Julia | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | OWENS Elise | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
76 | KIM Sydney | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
77 | REN Kayley | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
78 | KATS Ekaterina | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
79 | MCDERMOTT Catherine | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
80 | OH Ceana | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
81 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
82 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 81% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
83 | GUO Audrey | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
84 | CAMPBELL June | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
85 | DONG Emily | 100% | 90% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
86 | TSE Isabel | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
87 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
88 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
89 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
90 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
90 | CHANG Janelle | 100% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
92 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
93 | LAWRENCE Nia | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
94 | HOOGSTRA Lucy | 100% | 90% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
95 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.