Glenview, IL - Glenview, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 2 | BAE Junnie | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | HERGAN Luca A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 6 | YI Stephen K. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | OAKLAND Brennan D. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | DESERANNO Jeidus | V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 9 | NEWHARD Noah A. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | NOWAK Joseph A. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 11 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | LI Simon A. | D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 14 | WITTENBERG Jackson H. | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 15 | YANG Luao | V V D V D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 16 | SHEN Troy R. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | LEE Connor C. | V V V V D V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | CHO Jeremy Y. | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 19 | LIU Jacob B. | V V D D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | FLYNN Ian | V D V D D V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 21 | POLONSKI Anthony | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 22 | PALWAI Suhas | D D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 23 | PAI Lakshan K. | D D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 24 | DEDENBACH Joseph | D D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | REEVES Liam | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | JI Aidan Y. | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 27 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 28 | SZELA Tom J. | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 29 | SHEN Luke R. | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 30 | SANTOS Carlos R. | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | ROEVER Sean M. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | BOLD Timothy | D D D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 33 | KWON Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 34 | KHAN Adnan | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.