The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CO Dylan | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 2 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 3 | SMITH Grant D. | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 49% | 14% |
| 3 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 5 | MA Andrew | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 6 | LING Eddie | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 46% |
| 7 | WANG Ethan | - | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
| 8 | LAM Nicolas | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 3% |
| 9 | SETLUR Bhrugu | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
| 10 | LI Matthew | - | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 22% |
| 11 | EDISON Ansel | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 14% |
| 12 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 60% |
| 13 | KIM Daniel Y. | - | - | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% |
| 14 | BERMAN Michael | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 15 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 38% | 10% |
| 16 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | - | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | QIU Zhaocheng | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
| 18 | MA Bryant | - | - | 4% | 28% | 47% | 21% |
| 18 | REICHEL Ezra | - | 1% | 27% | 44% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 33% |
| 21 | ZHOU Ryan | - | 8% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | LIU William | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
| 23 | UZGIRIS Kovas | - | - | 17% | 42% | 33% | 8% |
| 24 | RUBIN Max | - | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% |
| 25 | LI Richard | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 46% | 18% |
| 26 | PETROV Mikhail | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | ZHAN Kevin | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | SAH Steven | - | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 2% |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 10% |
| 30 | MIETTINEN Pyry | 2% | 35% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ANWEILER Nathan | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 4% | 33% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 33 | PETERSON Lucas | 8% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LO Preston | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 43% | 8% |
| 35 | MAK Osman K. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 37 | YUE Jackson | 1% | 22% | 53% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 38 | GORDON William L. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 40 | TUAN Evan | - | 6% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% |
| 41 | ZHANG Jayden | 14% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | TSAY Jordan R. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | SISINNI Leonardo | 1% | 13% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | DAYAL Vedant | 16% | 48% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | UPENDER West | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 46 | WONG Braxton | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | JIANG Yehong | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | BECKER Ethan | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | LEHTINEN Axel | 9% | 56% | 31% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 23% | 72% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ADAMS Cedric | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 53 | LIANG Ethan | 54% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | BHANOT Arjun | 74% | 26% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | AUYEUNG Isaac | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 56 | HE Bourne | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BANUELOS Dario | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | BOYNTON Alex | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GILMARTIN Colin | 38% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | WOO Noah | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.