The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 2 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 14% |
| 3 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 5 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% |
| 6 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% |
| 7 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% |
| 8 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
| 9 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% |
| 10 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 22% |
| 11 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% |
| 12 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 13 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 15% |
| 14 | BERMAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
| 15 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | 10% |
| 16 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 87% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
| 18 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 21% |
| 18 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 72% | 28% | 4% |
| 20 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% |
| 21 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 22 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 7% |
| 23 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 41% | 8% |
| 24 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 25 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 18% |
| 26 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 75% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 27 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | SAH Steven | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 10% |
| 30 | MIETTINEN Pyry | 100% | 98% | 63% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 31 | ANWEILER Nathan | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 96% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 33 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 8% |
| 35 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 37 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 77% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 38 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 39 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
| 40 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% |
| 41 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% | 1% |
| 43 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | DAYAL Vedant | 100% | 84% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | UPENDER West | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 46 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 84% | 43% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | JIANG Yehong | 100% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | LEHTINEN Axel | 100% | 91% | 35% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 100% | 77% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 52 | ADAMS Cedric | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 53 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | BHANOT Arjun | 100% | 26% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | AUYEUNG Isaac | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 56 | HE Bourne | 100% | 81% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | BANUELOS Dario | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | BOYNTON Alex | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | GILMARTIN Colin | 100% | 62% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | WOO Noah | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.