John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
| 2 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 55% |
| 3 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
| 3 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% |
| 5 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 6 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 7 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | |
| 8 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 9 | SAGE Michael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 27% |
| 10 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
| 11 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 91% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 12 | YOON Junhyeok | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 4% |
| 14 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 15 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 18% | |
| 16 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | 3% | |
| 17 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% |
| 18 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% |
| 20 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 21 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | PAZ Luis | 100% | 96% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 23 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 25 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | PRUT Anton | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | YU William | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | BOKAM Dhruva | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 29 | DAFFRON Quintin | 100% | 87% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | MILES Greyson | 100% | 74% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 31 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | LIU hangda | 100% | 57% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | DANIZ FERNANDO A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 34 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | 100% | 98% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | MITCHELL Henry | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | HARWOOD Gray | 100% | 87% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | TAYLOR Benjamin | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BOCKSNICK John Robert | 100% | 72% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 39 | CANADY Isaac | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | HARKINS Asher | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.