Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 2 | ANDERSON Brendan P. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 5 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | ZHOU Austin | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 7 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | MCADOO Declan | V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 11 | TAYLOR Jataya | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | KENT Elizabeth J. | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | KENT V David | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | HADLER David J. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | GAO Zachary | D D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 15 | WEISS Mateo | V D D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 17 | DANIS Blake M. | V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | KANESHIGE Christina Y. | V V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 19 | GORMLEY Robert | V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | KOSANOVICH Jillian | D V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 21 | MUENKE Magnus | V V V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 22 | FRENCH Phaelen | D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 23 | BARANOWSKI Philip | V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | CLAYMAN John A. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | SUN Neo | D V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 26 | LEE Jayden J. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 27 | CHAN Andrew M. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 28 | AGGELER Donovan | D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | LONG Sam | V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 30 | DARRICAU Henri J. | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 31 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | V D D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 32 | ISAACSON Calev | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | HANEY Kimberly M. | D D V V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 34 | LEWIS Rachel | V D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 35 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 36 | ZHU Riley | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 37 | BROOKS Justin | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 38 | STOY Patrick | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 39 | ALLEN-BRUNS Ryder | V V D D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 40 | SHADE Nadine | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 41 | FREEMAN Katherine | D V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 42 | EMERSON Zachary | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 43 | MILLER Mason | D D D D V | D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 |
| 44 | THOMSON Sarah | D D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 45 | ISAACSON Henny | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | BLANCHARD Timothy | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 47 | STOY Sophia | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 48 | WEBER Dick | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 49 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 50 | WARD Haley V. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 51 | GOODHEART Mateo | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 52 | KANE Frank | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.