Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAFOYA Devin D. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
| 2 | ANDERSON Brendan P. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 48% | 35% | 6% |
| 3 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 5 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 35% | 2% |
| 6 | ZHOU Austin | 2% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 7 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 53% | 19% | |
| 8 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | MCADOO Declan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
| 10 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 11 | TAYLOR Jataya | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | KENT Elizabeth J. | - | 2% | 20% | 52% | 23% | 2% | |
| 13 | KENT V David | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% | |
| 14 | HADLER David J. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 15 | GAO Zachary | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
| 15 | WEISS Mateo | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | DANIS Blake M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
| 18 | KANESHIGE Christina Y. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 19 | GORMLEY Robert | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 20 | KOSANOVICH Jillian | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | MUENKE Magnus | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | FRENCH Phaelen | 3% | 28% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | BARANOWSKI Philip | - | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | CLAYMAN John A. | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 25 | SUN Neo | 2% | 26% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | LEE Jayden J. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 47% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | CHAN Andrew M. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
| 28 | AGGELER Donovan | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | LONG Sam | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 12% | |
| 30 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 31 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | ISAACSON Calev | 1% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 33 | HANEY Kimberly M. | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | LEWIS Rachel | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ALPERSTEIN Donald W. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
| 36 | ZHU Riley | 3% | 36% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | BROOKS Justin | 12% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | STOY Patrick | 2% | 28% | 50% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | ALLEN-BRUNS Ryder | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 1% |
| 40 | SHADE Nadine | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | FREEMAN Katherine | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | EMERSON Zachary | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MILLER Mason | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 44 | THOMSON Sarah | 51% | 46% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | ISAACSON Henny | - | 14% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 46 | BLANCHARD Timothy | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | STOY Sophia | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | WEBER Dick | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HOLLOWAY IMRIE Colin | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | WARD Haley V. | 11% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | GOODHEART Mateo | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | KANE Frank | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.