Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HADLER David J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 43% |
| 2 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | CLAYMAN John A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 42% | 15% |
| 3 | LEE Jayden J. | - | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% |
| 5 | LEE Seungwon | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 52% | 3% |
| 6 | KOSANOVICH Jillian | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 7 | WU Lucas | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 8 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | - | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | GRAY Caidan | - | 2% | 26% | 46% | 22% | 3% | < 1% |
| 10 | TAYLOR Jataya | - | - | 3% | 13% | 35% | 40% | 9% |
| 11 | CANNON Lira J. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | |
| 12 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 13 | ARCHIBALD Ian | 8% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | CHAN Andrew M. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% |
| 15 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 16 | ISAACSON Calev | 3% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 17 | LIU Josh | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | WEISS Mateo | - | 15% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LONG Sam | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 20 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
| 21 | LEWIS Rachel | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | STRAUSS Luke | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LIU Xiang | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 24 | SUN Neo | 29% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | AGGELER Donovan | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 27 | EMERSON Zachary | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 27% | 4% | |
| 28 | CURRY Ronald | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | WARD Haley V. | - | 2% | 42% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ZHOU Austin | 7% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | REIFF Mathilda | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | STOY Patrick | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | BOBIER Lucas | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | NANNEMANN Chandler | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | ISAACSON Henny | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MCADOO Declan | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | THOMSON Sarah | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | ANDERSON Aslan | 15% | 66% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | MEESE Shane | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LUTTON Patricia | 31% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZHU Riley | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.