Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HADLER David J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% |
| 2 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 10% |
| 3 | CLAYMAN John A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 15% |
| 3 | LEE Jayden J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 4% |
| 5 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 3% |
| 6 | KOSANOVICH Jillian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 7 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
| 8 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | GRAY Caidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 26% | 3% | < 1% |
| 10 | TAYLOR Jataya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 9% |
| 11 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% | |
| 12 | DARRICAU Henri J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 13 | ARCHIBALD Ian | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | CHAN Andrew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% |
| 15 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 16 | ISAACSON Calev | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 17 | LIU Josh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | WEISS Mateo | 100% | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | LONG Sam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 21 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 22 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LIU Xiang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 24 | SUN Neo | 100% | 71% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | AGGELER Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 27 | EMERSON Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | 4% | |
| 28 | CURRY Ronald | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | WARD Haley V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ZHOU Austin | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | REIFF Mathilda | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | STOY Patrick | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | BOBIER Lucas | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | NANNEMANN Chandler | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | ISAACSON Henny | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | THOMSON Sarah | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | ANDERSON Aslan | 100% | 85% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | MEESE Shane | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LUTTON Patricia | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | ZHU Riley | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.