San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHO Inga | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | BHATT Morgane | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
| 3 | CHAPMAN Lesley F. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 28% | |
| 3 | KERR Margaret E. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% |
| 5 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 6 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 39% | 10% | |
| 7 | GUTKOVSKAYA Nora | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
| 8 | MADDOX Lacey E. | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 9 | FAGAN Margaret | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 10 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 54% | 9% |
| 11 | WHITT Lynnette A. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
| 12 | FEDDE Rachel A. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 13 | LEE Claire L. | 8% | 41% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 15 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | BASSIK Judith M. | 1% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
| 19 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 47% | 17% | 1% |
| 20 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
| 21 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | THURMAN Allison L. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 23 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 1% | 15% | 45% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 24 | HUEY Sharone A. | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | LIPPMAN Soyeon | - | 7% | 32% | 44% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SELTZER Eve | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | CHACE-ORTIZ Naneen | 27% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | MORRISON Monica L. | 1% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | BALCE Cyril | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | HERAWATI Lili | 49% | 43% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | LUTTON Patricia | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | COMES Rita | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | ANGULOT Sharon | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | MOORE Annette | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.