San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Inga | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% |
2 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
3 | CHAPMAN Lesley F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
3 | KERR Margaret E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% |
5 | WALTERS Anne-Marie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | |
6 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% | |
7 | GUTKOVSKAYA Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 14% | |
8 | MADDOX Lacey E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
9 | FAGAN Margaret | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
10 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 9% |
11 | WHITT Lynnette A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
12 | FEDDE Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
13 | LEE Claire L. | 100% | 92% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |
14 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
15 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | HERMES Kathleen A. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% |
19 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 18% | 1% |
20 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
21 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
22 | THURMAN Allison L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
23 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 7% | - | - |
24 | HUEY Sharone A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
25 | LIPPMAN Soyeon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 61% | 17% | 1% | - |
26 | SELTZER Eve | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
27 | CHACE-ORTIZ Naneen | 100% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 100% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
29 | MORRISON Monica L. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
30 | BALCE Cyril | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
31 | HERAWATI Lili | 100% | 51% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
32 | LUTTON Patricia | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
33 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | |
34 | COMES Rita | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
35 | ANGULOT Sharon | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
36 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
37 | GUNTRUM Pamella (Pam) L. | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
38 | MOORE Annette | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.