San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
| 2 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 50% | 12% |
| 3 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 3 | POPOKH Leo | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 33% | 7% |
| 5 | BALBOA Rolando M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 6 | BENNETT Philippe | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 7 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 49% | 30% |
| 8 | CUNNINGHAM Scott | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 9 | FLANAGAN James | - | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 49% | 18% |
| 11 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 12 | TANG Julian | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% |
| 13 | GAVILLI Lorenzo | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 14 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 15 | FADL Omar | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 16 | WOOD BEn | 21% | 54% | 22% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
| 17 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | < 1% | - |
| 18 | JONES Sam J. | - | - | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% |
| 19 | POWERS Douglas A. | - | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | KOEHN Ted | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 21 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | KLEIN Johannes | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 23 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 7% |
| 24 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | - | 2% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
| 25 | TOMASI John | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MARIANI Lou | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 15% |
| 28 | LEE Stephen K. | - | - | < 1% | 4% | 28% | 65% | 3% |
| 29 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | 2% | 17% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | JONES Bryan T. | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 31 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 34 | LEYLAND John | - | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 35 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 36 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 17% | 57% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SAUCEDO Fernando | 17% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | VALENTINE Iain | - | 8% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 39 | CARTER Tony | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 40 | WU Jingxiao | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | POOLE James M. | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KRAUSS John W. | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 43 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 5% | 36% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | LI Sheng | 74% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | SESSIONS Adrian | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | CHAO Pierre | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | RESS Michael A. | - | 1% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | RUSANOV Oleg | 1% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 50 | YOO Terry S. | 7% | 35% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | ORNELAS Polo | 59% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | NEWELL Tim | 17% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | FELDMAN Louis | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 48% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | HILL David E. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.