San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 6.0 | 6 | - |
| 2 | PAI Dong-Ying | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | POPOKH Leo | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 5 | BALBOA Rolando M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | BENNETT Philippe | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 7 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 8 | CUNNINGHAM Scott | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 9 | FLANAGAN James | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 10 | DARRICAU Henri J. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 12 | TANG Julian | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 13 | GAVILLI Lorenzo | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 14 | LAWRENCE John W. | V V D V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 15 | FADL Omar | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | WOOD BEn | V V D V V D | V V D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 17 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | V V V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 18 | JONES Sam J. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 19 | POWERS Douglas A. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | KOEHN Ted | V V V V D D | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 21 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 22 | KLEIN Johannes | V V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 24 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | V D V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 25 | TOMASI John | V V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 26 | MARIANI Lou | D V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | VOYIAZIAKIS Emanuel | D D V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 28 | LEE Stephen K. | D V D V D D | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 29 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | JONES Bryan T. | D D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 31 | GLADNICK Michael J. | D D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 32 | ROUNTREE Andrew | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V D V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 34 | LEYLAND John | D V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 35 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | D D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | D D D V V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 37 | SAUCEDO Fernando | V D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 38 | VALENTINE Iain | V V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 39 | CARTER Tony | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 40 | WU Jingxiao | V D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 41 | POOLE James M. | D D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 42 | KRAUSS John W. | V D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 43 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | D D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 44 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 45 | LI Sheng | D D D D D V | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 46 | SESSIONS Adrian | D D D D D V | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 47 | CHAO Pierre | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | RESS Michael A. | D D D D D V | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 48 | RUSANOV Oleg | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | YOO Terry S. | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 51 | ORNELAS Polo | D D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 52 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 53 | NEWELL Tim | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 54 | FELDMAN Louis | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 55 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 56 | HILL David E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.