Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 2 | MALLOY Patrick G. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
| 3 | LANGE Eric A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 3 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 5 | FULLERTON Houston T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 6 | TIYA Biaya K. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 7 | NORMAN Christian | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
| 8 | MCFARLAND Kai | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 9 | HUTTO Joshua | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 10 | JACKSON James | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 11 | THOMPSON Daniel M. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 40% | 13% |
| 13 | TEITENBERG John F. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 14 | WANG Bryan | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 15% | |
| 15 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 16 | LEWIS Jared | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 17 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 18 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | CHUNG Joshua | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | WAGNER Lyndsay K. | - | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 21 | SARIKONDA Akhil | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 22 | JAAFAR Omar | - | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% |
| 23 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 52% | 11% |
| 24 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 25 | NGUYEN Hubert | 1% | 13% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | KUCIA Michael J. | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 39% | 9% | - |
| 27 | SINGH Arnav | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | LIN Kason | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | KIM Daniel | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 31 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 32 | REDDY Daksh | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Aidan | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | ATON Dave | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 35 | RACHEL Dylan | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Eli | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 37 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHOU Alec Q. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 53% | 12% |
| 39 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | SOTTILE Cole | 1% | 9% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHA Patrick | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | FREY Wayne N. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 43 | LU Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 44 | MCCUBBINS Tyler | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KONG Chuizheng | 7% | 34% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | MCFARLAND John G. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 47 | PARK Andrew | 2% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | GARBER Robert A. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 49 | PULLEN Ayah | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 51 | NGUYEN Audrey | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 52 | TURK Reggie | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PATEL Krishiv | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ARZT Nicholas | 3% | 28% | 52% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LEE Aaron | 6% | 38% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LIU Elinda | 29% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | KRIEGER Jack | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | ZHOU Alex | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | NAM Nathaniel | 7% | 59% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | SOPER Adam | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | PETE Landon | 23% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | JEONG Arisu | 22% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 64 | MIHILL Margaret | 36% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 66 | LEE Daehyeon | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | WILFORD Madigan | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | HAWKINS Sophia | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | DOUGLAS John | 20% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | MOSS Riley | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | RODGERS Kaden | 11% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | EDWARDS Darby | 7% | 41% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.