Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIN Andy (Sung-moon) (Andy) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 2 | MALLOY Patrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% |
| 3 | LANGE Eric A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 3 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 5 | FULLERTON Houston T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% |
| 6 | TIYA Biaya K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 7 | NORMAN Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% |
| 8 | MCFARLAND Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 9 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 10 | JACKSON James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | THOMPSON Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 12 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 13% |
| 13 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 14 | WANG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% | |
| 15 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 16 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 17 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 18 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 20 | WAGNER Lyndsay K. | 100% | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 22 | JAAFAR Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
| 23 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 11% |
| 24 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | NGUYEN Hubert | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 26 | KUCIA Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | 10% | - |
| 27 | SINGH Arnav | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 29 | LIN Kason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 30 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 31 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 32 | REDDY Daksh | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | ATON Dave | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 5% | - |
| 35 | RACHEL Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Eli | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 12% |
| 39 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 40 | SOTTILE Cole | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHA Patrick | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | FREY Wayne N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 43 | LU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 44 | MCCUBBINS Tyler | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KONG Chuizheng | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | MCFARLAND John G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
| 47 | PARK Andrew | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | GARBER Robert A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 49 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 50 | LABROZZI Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 52 | TURK Reggie | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PATEL Krishiv | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 69% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LEE Aaron | 100% | 94% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | LIU Elinda | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | KRIEGER Jack | 100% | 82% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | ZHOU Alex | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 93% | 34% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | SOPER Adam | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 62 | PETE Landon | 100% | 77% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 63 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 78% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 64 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 66 | LEE Daehyeon | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | WILFORD Madigan | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 69 | HAWKINS Sophia | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 70 | DOUGLAS John | 100% | 80% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 71 | MOSS Riley | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 73 | RODGERS Kaden | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 93% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.