Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | SMOTHERMAN Jason N. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | THOMAS Samuel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | BARFORD Giovanni | V D V V V V | V V D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 6 | STAUBITZ Marc | V D V D V D | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 7 | DAZEY Jason T. | D D D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 8 | DUNKLIN Cameron | D D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | PRIJATEL John R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | SON Eric | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | PAMERLEAU Ian | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | KRAJ Pawel | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | LAUER Michael | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | EDWARDS Tim | D V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | SWANSON Dave | D V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | MILLER Brent | V V V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 18 | SERAFYM Damian | D V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 19 | FANG Samuel | V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | HE Lingyun Matthew | V V V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 21 | SOARE Maria Elena | V V V D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 22 | VAN DYK Mark | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 23 | LASKA Patryk | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 24 | MACNEIL Matthew | V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | KRAVITZ Sarah | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | FAUGHT Dalton | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 27 | MILLER Hayden | V D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | WILTSHIRE Kaden | D D V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | RIPLEY Ian | D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 30 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | MBERIA Alexander | D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | TARR Robert | D D D D D V | V D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
| 33 | ORGAN Jason | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 34 | PIERCE Marcia M. | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 35 | MACNEIL Sydney | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 36 | BRETHAUER Adah | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 37 | DUTTON Kitty | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 38 | WELLS Aenea | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.