Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 3 | SMOTHERMAN Jason N. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | THOMAS Samuel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 5 | BARFORD Giovanni | V D V V V V | V V D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 6 | STAUBITZ Marc | V D V D V D | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 7 | DAZEY Jason T. | D D D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 8 | DUNKLIN Cameron | D D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | PRIJATEL John R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | SON Eric | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | PAMERLEAU Ian | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 12 | KRAJ Pawel | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | LAUER Michael | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | EDWARDS Tim | D V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 15 | SWANSON Dave | D V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | REED Dusty (Allen) | V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 17 | MILLER Brent | V V V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 18 | SERAFYM Damian | D V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 19 | FANG Samuel | V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 20 | HE Lingyun Matthew | V V V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 21 | SOARE Maria Elena | V V V D D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 22 | VAN DYK Mark | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 23 | LASKA Patryk | D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 24 | MACNEIL Matthew | V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | KRAVITZ Sarah | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | FAUGHT Dalton | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 27 | MILLER Hayden | V D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | WILTSHIRE Kaden | D D V D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | RIPLEY Ian | D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 30 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | MBERIA Alexander | D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | TARR Robert | D D D D D V | V D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
| 33 | ORGAN Jason | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 34 | PIERCE Marcia M. | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 35 | MACNEIL Sydney | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 36 | BRETHAUER Adah | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 37 | DUTTON Kitty | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 38 | WELLS Aenea | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.