Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 3 | SMOTHERMAN Jason N. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
| 3 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% |
| 5 | BARFORD Giovanni | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 6 | STAUBITZ Marc | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 7 | DAZEY Jason T. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 8 | DUNKLIN Cameron | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 9 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 10 | SON Eric | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 11 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 24% |
| 12 | KRAJ Pawel | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 13 | LAUER Michael | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 14 | EDWARDS Tim | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
| 15 | SWANSON Dave | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 16 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 17 | MILLER Brent | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 18 | SERAFYM Damian | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 20% | 3% |
| 19 | FANG Samuel | 1% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 1% | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | SOARE Maria Elena | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | VAN DYK Mark | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | LASKA Patryk | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 14% | 54% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 3% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | FAUGHT Dalton | 2% | 16% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | MILLER Hayden | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | WILTSHIRE Kaden | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | RIPLEY Ian | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 10% | |
| 30 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | - | 7% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | MBERIA Alexander | 10% | 53% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 32 | TARR Robert | - | < 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 33 | ORGAN Jason | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | PIERCE Marcia M. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 35 | MACNEIL Sydney | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | BRETHAUER Adah | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | DUTTON Kitty | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | WELLS Aenea | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.