Marin Fencing Academy - San Rafael, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
| 2 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 3 | JAKLITSCH Michael (Mike) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 3 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 5 | CAMPBELL-KRUGER Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 6 | SOULAIRE Tom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 25% | |
| 7 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | KENNY Oliver R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 9 | SODHI Jaco | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 6% | |
| 10 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 9% | |
| 13 | AHMED Isa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% |
| 15 | SITTER Gregoire | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | - |
| 16 | SIM Ian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | |
| 17 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 18 | HARGROVE Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | |
| 19 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 100% | 98% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 21 | MOLLINIER Angel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | MITTMAN Lela Z. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 23 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 24 | ACKERMANN Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
| 25 | MA Ryan | 100% | 78% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | RISTOW Carsten | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 27 | CHENG Zijun | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
| 29 | CONTI Braeden | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | LOGUE Paul | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | LIN Jason | 100% | 64% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | MORETTI David | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | PERALTA Christian | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | SITTER Keano | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | LIN Shenghai | 100% | 50% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | LIN Andrew | 100% | 81% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | MCGUIRE Maximilien | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | BUJANOVER Maayan | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.