Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
2 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | 2% | 19% | 51% | 28% | |
3 | WESTPHAL David R. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 47% |
3 | MCADOO Declan | - | - | - | 8% | 37% | 45% | 10% |
5 | MCCOWN Ronan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
6 | GAO Zachary | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
7 | AGGELER Donovan | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
8 | LEE Seungwon | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 41% | |
9 | ZHOU Austin | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
10 | LIU Josh | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 4% | |
11 | HARR Carver | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
12 | KENT V David | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 4% |
13 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 56% | 14% |
14 | PETERSON Matthew | - | 1% | 15% | 50% | 29% | 5% | |
15 | DANIS Blake M. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
16 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
17 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
18 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
19 | ZHU Riley | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | FRENCH Phaelen | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
21 | WANG Zoe | 3% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 3% | - | |
22 | MILEY Walker | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
23 | BUERGISSER Kai | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 8% | - |
24 | ISAACSON Calev | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
25 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
26 | BROOKS Justin | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | MARENCIK Miles | 2% | 17% | 47% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
28 | LEWIS Rachel | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
29 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
30 | RAYNER Jack | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
31 | MCGOUGH Kevin | 5% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | FREEMAN Katherine | 15% | 52% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | SUN Neo | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
34 | SHULL Marc | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
35 | ISAACSON Henny | 11% | 51% | 35% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | BEALL Milo M. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
37 | RALSTON Katherine | 40% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | MILLER Mason | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | GAN Shelby | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
40 | EMERSON Zachary | 28% | 53% | 18% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | HANEY Kimberly M. | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
42 | BIGGERSTAFF Luke | 18% | 43% | 32% | 7% | - | - | - |
43 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
44 | LIM Marcus | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | MUENKE Magnus | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
46 | WARD Zachary | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.