Culver Academies - Culver, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAN Jack P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 2 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |||
| 3 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 36% | ||
| 3 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 5% | |
| 5 | LIU Edward H. | 100% | 88% | 14% | ||||
| 6 | NIETO Jacob | 100% | 98% | 72% | 24% | |||
| 7 | KILBOURNE Lance | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 8 | LEVSKY Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 9 | HAM Kevin P. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 12% | |||
| 10 | LEFEVRE Colin B. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 48% | |||
| 11 | CELADINA Charles C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | ||
| 12 | MURZYN III Cj | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 13 | LIU Jonathan M. | 100% | 96% | 65% | ||||
| 14 | MCMAHON Brendan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | ||
| 15 | PINTO Gabriel R. | 100% | 58% | 8% | - | |||
| 16 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 92% | 56% | 14% | |||
| 17 | GRIFFITH Joseph | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
| 18 | ERVIN William T. | 100% | 75% | 30% | 4% | |||
| 19 | KELLY Nicko | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 6% | ||
| 20 | BIRKS Evan D. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | WINEBURNER J.T. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LU Evan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 2% | ||
| 23 | PARKER Timothy S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 24 | HUBBARD Wyatt | 100% | 34% | 3% | ||||
| 25 | CHAMBERS Joshua A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 27 | YOO Steve | 100% | 85% | 44% | 9% | |||
| 28 | CHAN Jacob | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |||
| 32 | URY Barret | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | KOKKIN Jack S. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | |||
| 35 | HILLYER Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% | ||
| 37 | RICHARDSON Gabriel A. | 100% | 93% | 58% | 15% | |||
| 38 | SKATKOV Eduard | 100% | 97% | 63% | 9% | |||
| 44 | KIEDROWSKI Alex | 100% | 78% | 33% | 5% | |||
| 48 | SHEN Christopher | 100% | 94% | 64% | 19% | |||
| 49 | LARSON John | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | TUCKER Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | BERN Brendan T. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 54 | PASTER Eli | 100% | 78% | 32% | 5% | - | ||
| 57 | MANDEL Jackson | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 58 | FOUNTAIN Gavin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 60 | CHENG Albert | 100% | 81% | 34% | 6% | - | ||
| 62 | ENNIS Ronnie | 100% | 80% | 23% | 2% | |||
| 63 | BENNING Conor | 100% | 81% | 34% | 5% | - | ||
| 66 | BALLAD Alexander | 100% | 74% | 26% | 3% | |||
| 68 | CHAVEZ Demetrio | 100% | 81% | 38% | 7% | |||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.