The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DEANS Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% |
2 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
3 | MULLENNIX Ethan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
3 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
5 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
6 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
7 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
8 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | 1% |
9 | KANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
10 | TSE Aiden J | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | - |
11 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
12 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
13 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 12% | - |
14 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
15 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
16 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | 1% |
17 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
18 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
19 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
20 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 1% |
21 | AERY FALLICK Ozzie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
21 | TAN Ryan | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
23 | HO Anson | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
24 | GAY Jono | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
25 | WHEELER Nathaniel C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
26 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
27 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
28 | BERMENDER Cameron | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
29 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | LI Li | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
31 | ANUMULA Aryan | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
32 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
33 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - |
34 | IYER Neil | 100% | 80% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
35 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
36 | VO Landon | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
37 | WANG HongXi | 100% | 92% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
37 | MATHUR Ativ | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | WONG David | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | LI Seth | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
41 | LE Long | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
42 | FLINN Ryan | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.