USC PED North Gym - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 2 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% |
| 3 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% |
| 5 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 6 | MUSGRAVE Walter N. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% |
| 7 | WU Ian Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% |
| 8 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% |
| 9 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 13% |
| 10 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 57% |
| 11 | WILLIAMS Terrill D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 60% | 12% |
| 12 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
| 13 | MUNOZ Humberto | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% |
| 14 | NIXON Mark | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 17% |
| 15 | SHAHRIL Natalia | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 16 | KRUGER Mark | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 17 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% |
| 18 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 11% |
| 19 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 92% | 42% | 7% | - |
| 20 | JU Hanul | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 4% |
| 21 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 24% |
| 22 | SWANSON Ronan J. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 24 | JENSEN David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 25 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 100% | 95% | 52% | 8% |
| 26 | BELL Michael S. | 100% | 90% | 48% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 28 | ALLEN David | 100% | 86% | 33% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KIM Michael | 100% | 91% | 54% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | CHAO Warren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 42% | 3% |
| 31 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 32 | KIM Remington | 100% | 51% | 7% | - | - |
| 33 | WELBORN Kathrina | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 34 | FERRIERE Thomas | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 35 | ITO WILSON Miles | 100% | 92% | 19% | 1% | - |
| 36 | CREASON Nicholas | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
| 37 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 73% | 31% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | LEON Miguel | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 39 | GALLIVAN James | 100% | 10% | - | - | - |
| 39 | VASILYEVA Nadia | 100% | 95% | 42% | 6% | - |
| 41 | HUANG Tony | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 41 | BEAVER Nathaniel | 100% | 90% | 50% | 8% | - |
| 43 | KHOO Mason | 100% | 88% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 44 | CAO Vincent | 100% | 73% | 27% | 3% | - |
| 45 | TAMIR Annika | 100% | 86% | 32% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.