Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 6% |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | |
| 3 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 3 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | 8% | |
| 5 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
| 6 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 5% | |
| 7 | YU Jason | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | DICKENS Robert W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 15% | |
| 9 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
| 10 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 12% |
| 11 | KENYON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% |
| 12 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 14 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 15 | ASUNCION Arren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 16 | HULL Liam | 100% | 96% | 66% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | ISERT Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 18 | EVANS George | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 19 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% | |
| 20 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 96% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | POLANICHKA Nicole | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 23 | MURPHY Megan | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | COLETTA David | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | KOOB Julian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 26 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% | 5% |
| 27 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | LENAR David | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | IHRIE Greg H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 97% | 72% | 7% | - | - | |
| 31 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 32 | MERIWETHER Anne | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WILKINSON Douglas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 34 | SAVAGE Austin | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | ORLANDO Janine | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | FORAIDA Khalid | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 6% | - | - |
| 37 | PERKINS Zoe | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.